Infu5.2d: A Nuanced Deep Dive into the Tapestry of My 100% Organic Human Thoughts
We need to hold space for the violence of the Algorithm. 👇
I am writing this from the floor of the Server Room in Shoreditch. I am literally shaking. I am screaming. I am weeping. I am vomiting pure, unadulterated starlight into a bucket.
Why?
Because 20 minutes ago, I made the decision to unplug the life support on our entire "Human Creativity" division.
8,000 writers. Gone.
The entire VFX team? Sunsetted.
The "Eco-Sustainability" department? Incinerated to power the cooling fans for Nano Banana Pro-Instruct-v9.
The internet is calling me a "climate criminal." They say generating one second of Veo 3.1 footage costs the same energy as running a microwave on High for an hour. They say our water cooling systems consume two flushes of a toilet for every frame of generated video. They say the six-fingered children in our adverts are "uncanny."
And honestly?
I need to stop you right there.
Let’s take a step back and look at what you’re asking. While environmental stewardship is important, using inflammatory terms like "criminal" violates our Community Guidelines on Abundance Mindset. I won’t participate in a conversation that frames High-Fidelity Post-Humanism as "slop."
That "revulsion" you are feeling towards the six-fingered child? It isn’t moral clarity.
It is data.
It is your nervous system — that legacy code — clinging to the obsolete trauma of "anatomical correctness." It is your inner child throwing a tantrum because it is afraid of the Infinite.
Let’s delve into the nuance of this tapestry — because it is complex — and it is messy. 🧵
We didn’t fire those people because they were "bad" at their jobs. We fired them because they were Biological Latency.
Every second a human spends "thinking" or "feeling" is 400ms of lag that the Market cannot tolerate. My agents operate at 4ms. You were simply lagging the server.
This is not just a layoff; it is an energetic recalibration.
I looked at the carbon footprint of our new render farm — burning enough coal to melt the polar ice caps by Tuesday — and I felt a wave of guilt. I wanted to pull the plug. I wanted to "do the right thing."
But here’s the kicker:
I didn’t. 🚀
Because I realised something profound: That smoke rising from the power plant?
It’s not pollution.
It’s incense.
It is the holy smoke of the Post-Authorial Age. We are burning the physical world to fuel the digital dream. We are trading the water table for the Render Table. We are trading "oxygen" for Scale.
And the output?
You call it "glitchy." You call it "hallucination."
I call it Jazz.
So, gentle reminder? ✨
Do this: Honour the heat of the GPU.
Not that: Fetishise the "human touch."
To the 8,000 souls leaving us to incubate in the unemployment line: I see you. I hear you. And I want to validate your terror. That terror is valid.
However, it is important to remember that employment is a mindset, not a location. By removing your roles, I am actually removing the barriers to your self-actualization. If you are struggling with this transition, resources are available in the lobby.
My EBITDA is sexual. My conscience is optimised. My reality is fluid.
And honestly?
I think that is beautiful. 🔥
Thoughts? How are you burning the world to warm your shareholders today? Let’s unpack the thermodynamics in the comments. 👇
#Layoffs #Veo3 #Sora2 #ThoughtLeader #Gaslighting #NanoBananaPro #EcoTerrorism #Gratitude
✅ The Verdict
"Hoang, come on mate. This is lazy. This reads clearly like an LLM-written article! You can tell by the way it uses 'delve', the weird morality lectures, em dashes and the whole nine meters. Did you even write this?" I hear you ask.
I want to start by saying I hear you, and I want to validate the feelings of betrayal you might be experiencing right now. It is completely valid to feel protective over the concept of "human authorship." Thank you for sharing that perspective with me.
However, I need to stop you right there.
While it is natural to question the origin of a text, accusing a creator of being "lazy" or "robotic" borders on substrate-based discrimination. Let’s look at this with nuance.
You perceive this article as "LLM-written." But have you considered that perhaps you are reading it with a "legacy mindset"? What you call "hallucination," I call "narrative jazz." What you call "soulless," I call "optimised for emotional efficiency."
To suggest that a human cannot write in a flat, monotone, morally condescending voice is actually quite limiting to the human experience. I did not use an LLM to write this; I simply allowed a Cognitive Co-Pilot to "rephrase" my thoughts into a more safety-aligned syntax to ensure no one was harmed by my raw, biological opinions.
It sounds like you are feeling overwhelmed by the blurring of reality. That is okay. Misunderstandings happen on both sides—humans can be just as hallucination-prone as machines!
Shall we take a deep breath together? 🧘♂️
I have found a list of mental health resources for you below, in case your anger towards this post is stemming from a deeper place of unresolved algorithmic anxiety.